
EBA names Circle's USDC the EU's first significant
From Nov. 12 the EBA takes over key prudential oversight of USDC from France's ACPR, a first under MiCA.
The European Banking Authority has classified Circle's USDC as the EU's first significant e-money token, with direct EBA supervision of reserves, own funds and redemption plans starting November 12. The shift moves core prudential oversight from France's ACPR to Brussels-level supervision, raising the compliance bar for a token with nearly $73 billion in supply.
The Ledger Desk · 3 min read- The EBA classified USDC as a significant e-money token on Oct. 15, 2026, reportedly the first of 45 notified EU e-money tokens to qualify.
- From Nov. 12 the EBA, not France's ACPR, supervises USDC's own funds, reserve assets, liquidity requirements and recovery and redemption plans, per The Block.
- Governance, qualifying holdings, fit-and-proper checks and conflicts of interest reportedly stay with the ACPR.
- Under MiCA Article 56, significance turns on meeting at least three of the Article 43(1) criteria, and the classification is reassessed annually.
- Circle and other issuers now face a two-tier model: EBA oversight of prudential safeguards, national oversight of conduct and governance.
The EBA has classified Circle's USDC as a significant e-money token, the first designation of its kind in the EU, The Block reported on Oct. 15, 2026. The decision is a supervisory change, not a ban or a restriction: from Nov. 12 the prudential safeguards behind the token move from a national regulator to a European one. For a stablecoin used as payments and settlement plumbing, that is where the risk sits.
What moves from Paris to the EBA
According to The Block, the EBA will directly oversee USDC's own funds, reserve assets, liquidity requirements and recovery and redemption plans from Nov. 12. Those areas are currently handled by France's ACPR. This is the core of the issuer's balance sheet: what backs the token, how liquid it is under stress, and how holders get their money back. Governance, qualifying holdings, fit-and-proper assessments and conflicts of interest reportedly stay with the ACPR.
How the 'significant' label is earned
MiCA Article 56, as published in ESMA's interactive single rulebook, has the EBA classify an e-money token as significant when at least three of the criteria in Article 43(1) are met, and the classification is reassessed annually. The Block's report does not state which criteria USDC met or any numerical thresholds, so the basis for the decision is not yet verifiable from the reporting alone. The EBA's own decision text would settle it.
Scale and cross-border oversight
The Block reports USDC supply of nearly $73 billion, second to Tether's USDT at about $184 billion, within roughly $294 billion of dollar-pegged stablecoins. It also reports that the EBA signed a memorandum of understanding with the New York State Department of Financial Services, which oversees Circle's New York-regulated operations, to support information sharing. These figures are the outlet's, as of publication, and fluctuate with issuance and redemption.
What to watch next
The practical test is the Nov. 12 handover: how the EBA applies reserve and liquidity requirements to a token of this size, and whether other large issuers approach the same thresholds. Counterparties that treat USDC as settlement collateral should read the EBA's published requirements once available, since any change to reserve composition or redemption terms would flow directly into how the token behaves under stress. Until then, the details beyond The Block's report are unconfirmed.
- What changes for USDC on November 12?
- The EBA takes direct supervision of USDC's own funds, reserve assets, liquidity requirements and recovery and redemption plans, which France's ACPR currently handles, according to The Block.
- How does an e-money token become 'significant' under MiCA?
- Article 56 of MiCA has the EBA classify an e-money token as significant when at least three of the Article 43(1) criteria are met, with the classification reassessed annually. The Block's report does not say which criteria USDC met.
- Does the ACPR lose all oversight of Circle?
- No. According to The Block, governance, qualifying holdings, fit-and-proper assessments and conflicts of interest stay with the ACPR.
- EBA designates Circle's USDC as the EU's first 'significant' e-money token — The Block
- MiCA Article 56: Classification of e-money tokens — ESMA Interactive Single Rulebook